• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro

# Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
/0%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
/0%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
/54%

Add to comparison

Continental
Fulda
Kumho
Vredestein
DimensionsR16 - R22 R15 - R19 R16 - R19 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Good
1-222+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+ 2+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Rating: Good
2222-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P31,825,2
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,324,5
Kumho WinterCraft WP7135,728
Vredestein Wintrac Pro33,224,9
Show test details
Sportscars
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+ 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Test winner - highly recommended
9,6 9,18,78,0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Recommended
6,87,39,57,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Still recommended
7,17,87,86,5
Show test details