• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro

# Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
/0%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
/0%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
/90%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
/54%

Add to comparison

Continental
Fulda
Kumho
GoodYear
Vredestein
DimensionsR16 - R22 R15 - R19 R16 - R19 R15 - R22 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Good
1-222+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+ 2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Rating: Exemplary
22+1-2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Rating: Good
2222-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P31,825,2
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,324,5
Kumho WinterCraft WP7135,728
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+34,424,8
Vredestein Wintrac Pro33,224,9
Show test details
Sportscars
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+ 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Rating: Test winner - highly recommended
9,6 9,18,78,0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Recommended
6,87,39,57,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Still recommended
7,17,87,86,5
Show test details