12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R14 - R21	R13 - R23	R13 - R21	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 112

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 57

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

81.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

79.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76.2%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

75.8%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

74.7%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

80.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

83.8%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

64%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

61.4%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 D

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

79.8%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

76.3%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Sportscars Winter tyre test 2018 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2+	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands