12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R14 - R21	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 112

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 57

Number of tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

Best position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

Year of the last test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

81.2%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

79.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

75.8%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

74.7%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

80.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

83.8%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

79.8%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

76.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Sportscars Winter tyre test 2018 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2+	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands