Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
