Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV and Nokian WR SUV 4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
