Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Continental ContiWinterContact TS 830P SUV
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
