Segment
2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Ultrac Vorti were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,2 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||