Segment
2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,2 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
