Segment
2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nankang (0%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Nankang Sportnex AS-2+, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Sportnex AS-2+ were tested.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 101,1 | 130,3 | 102,4 | 100 | |
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Rating: Sufficient | 88,7 | 85,6 | 91,8 | 88,7 | 100,4 | 80,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
