Segment
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS91 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,4 | ||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 9,1 | 5,6 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,3 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
