In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Goodyear (74%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Efficient Grip Performance were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 101,1 | 130,3 | 102,4 | 100 | |
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Good | 95,3 | 91,5 | 99,0 | 125,3 | 99,5 | 93,3 | |
| Show test details | |||||||