Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 244 | 114 | 130 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||