12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 /0%	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 are both summer tyres aimed at passenger cars. On our comparison page we link to the original product pages for each tyre — Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 — and to their manufacturers (Continental and Yokohama). Note: the ContiPremiumContact 5 has since been succeeded by the Continental PremiumContact 6, which replaces this model.

Test summary
We compiled results from two independent comparative tests. In the large AutoBild group (50 tyres) the ContiPremiumContact 5 placed 9th of 50, while the Bluearth AE-50 finished 13th, showing the Continental a clear edge in a broad field. In the smaller Autoklub ČR test (9 tyres) the gap is even more pronounced: Continental finished 1st of 9, Yokohama 7th. Across these tests the ContiPremiumContact 5 demonstrates stronger and more consistent competitive performance.

What the numbers tell us

Consistency: Continental ranks higher in both a large international test and a national comparison, indicating reliable overall performance.

Relative position: Yokohama’s Bluearth AE-50 is competitive but tends to land in the mid-pack when compared side-by-side with market leaders like the Continental.

Model lifecycle: The ContiPremiumContact 5 has been replaced by a newer generation — consider the PremiumContact 6 for the latest improvements.

Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 — strengths & weaknesses
Strengths: The ContiPremiumContact 5 shows top-tier test positions and consistency across different test formats, which implies strong all-around performance. Its high placements suggest advantages in areas that matter most in comparative testing — balanced handling, braking and predictable behaviour under varied conditions. The tyre is manufactured in the Czech Republic (CZ).
Weaknesses: As an older model it has been superseded by the Continental PremiumContact 6, so buyers seeking the latest compound and tread design should consider the newer model for improved wear, noise or efficiency gains.

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 — strengths & weaknesses
Strengths: The Bluearth AE-50 performs respectably in comparative tests and represents a solid mid-field option in summer tyre line-ups. Its placement indicates it can offer good value for drivers prioritising comfort and economy over outright sport performance.
Weaknesses: Compared directly with the ContiPremiumContact 5, the Bluearth AE-50 falls behind in test rankings, particularly in the national Autoklub ČR comparison, suggesting it lacks the same level of all-round performance and consistency under competitive test conditions.

Verdict
Across the tests provided, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 is the stronger performer overall, delivering higher and more consistent rankings. The Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 is a competent mid-range summer tyre that may suit buyers focused on cost-effectiveness and comfort, but it does not match the Conti in comparative test results. If you want the most up-to-date Continental option, follow the link to the Continental PremiumContact 6. For product pages and further details consult the tyre links above or the manufacturers’ pages.

Segment

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Premium

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 35

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 14x

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

Best position in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 1.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 9.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 3.79

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

Year of the last test

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Good

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5

85.1%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

63.1%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 A

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

85.9%

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5

78.9%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

79%

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5

62.4%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 C

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

85%

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5

77.3%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,5	34,3
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5	36,4	36
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	37,7	40,2
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance
Best values in test	100	100	100	109
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak	95,6	93,6	97,5	97,2
Show test details