Segment
1. Continental ContiEcoContact 5 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiEcoContact 5 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiEcoContact 5 and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 81% of Continental ContiEcoContact 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Continental ContiEcoContact 5
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
