Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact SUV vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Continental (74%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/65 R17 test, where both the AllSeasonContact SUV and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. We also know where AllSeasonContact SUV is made - Slovakia.
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact SUV
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good2. Continental AllSeasonContact SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental AllSeasonContact SUV Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 1- | ||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
