Segment
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Toyo Celsius AS2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Toyo Celsius AS2 across multiple independent tests shows a clear performance gap. Our aggregated score for the Continental is 87% versus 54% for the Toyo, and test ranks consistently favour the Continental in wet, dry and winter disciplines. For manufacturer information see Continental and Toyo.
Overall test positions (selected):
- Autobild / 16 tyres: Continental positioned 2nd, Toyo 14th.
- AUTOBILD / 37 tyres: Continental 3rd, Toyo 12th.
- ACE / 9 tyres: Continental 1st, Toyo 9th.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — summary of strengths & weaknesses
- Strengths: Outstanding wet braking and wet handling, reliable snow traction, low exterior noise and good rolling resistance. Tests praise short braking distances on wet and snowy surfaces and strong dry handling — a true all-round performer with a dynamic feel.
- Weaknesses: Higher price point and in some reports only average aquaplaning reserves. A slight tendency to understeer was noted in sporty driving.
- Verdict: The Continental is the clear winner in mixed-condition testing — the best choice if you prioritise wet and winter safety, low noise and balanced performance across seasons.
Toyo Celsius AS2 — summary of strengths & weaknesses
- Strengths: Excellent value and high mileage — Toyo scores well for comfort, exterior noise and cost-effectiveness. Some tests highlight good aquaplaning reserves and very competitive kilometrage.
- Weaknesses: Consistently weaker in winter and wet performance: longer wet braking distances, reduced grip on snow and a tendency toward understeer on wet and snowy surfaces. Toyo’s overall handling in rain and snow falls significantly behind the Continental.
- Verdict: The Celsius AS2 is a budget-conscious, long-lasting choice for drivers in milder climates who primarily value comfort and wear. It is not recommended where strong wet braking or winter traction are priorities.
Head-to-head conclusion
Across the same test programs the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 consistently finished near the top (1st–3rd places in key comparative tests), while the Toyo Celsius AS2 tended to occupy lower positions (9th–14th). That pattern mirrors the numerical ratings (87% vs 54%) and the qualitative findings: Continental is the superior all-season tyre for balanced safety and performance; Toyo is better as a value / high-mileage alternative for less demanding conditions.
Neither model is reported as having been replaced by a newer generation at the time of these tests. For full test details and individual test reports see the tyre pages: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Toyo Celsius AS2.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 1– | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 41.5 | 44.9 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.4 | 51.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 3+ | 4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 39.9 | 59.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 51 | 66 | 52 | 24 | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 39 | 49 | 39 | 22 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
