Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Linglong Grip Master 4S

This comparison looks at two all‑season tyres tested across multiple Auto Bild test programs: the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Linglong Grip Master 4S. Both are positioned as all‑round solutions, but test results and lab evaluations place them at very different performance levels.

Summary of test positions: Continental consistently ranks at the top of its cohorts (e.g. 3rd of 37 and 5th of 35 in Auto Bild tests), while the Linglong is placed in the mid/low pack (14th of 37 and 20th of 35). This gap reflects clear differences highlighted in braking, handling and safety margins.

Key strengths — Continental AllSeasonContact 2:

• Excellent wet and snowy performance: multiple tests flag wet handling, wet braking and snow traction as standout attributes.


• Low exterior noise and good rolling resistance: praised for quiet operation and fuel‑friendly behaviour.


• Balanced, dynamic handling: described as an “all‑rounder” with sporty, secure behavior in mixed conditions.


• High overall test scores: our aggregated rating is 87%, reflecting top‑tier performance across conditions.

Weaknesses — Continental:

• Some tendency to understeer in aggressive manoeuvres noted in road tests.


• Average aquaplaning reserves in a few evaluations — competent but not class‑leading in extreme standing water scenarios.


• Premium positioning results in a relatively higher price compared with budget alternatives.

Key strengths — Linglong Grip Master 4S:

• Strong value-for-money: tests highlight price/value and comfort as its biggest selling points.


• Comfort and longevity: reviewers note good ride comfort and high mileage potential.


• Reliable dry‑road handling — stable and predictable on tarmac in non‑challenging conditions.

Weaknesses — Linglong:

• Weak wet and snowy performance: tests repeatedly show reduced grip and longer braking distances on wet and snow surfaces.


• Poorer aquaplaning reserves and limited safety margins in heavy rain or slush.


• Overall test rating is 59%, reflecting its budget positioning and trade‑offs in safety‑critical situations.

Head‑to‑head verdict:

Across mutual tests the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is clearly superior for drivers who prioritize safety, year‑round grip and low noise — it consistently finishes in the top tier and delivers short wet braking distances and strong snow traction. The Linglong Grip Master 4S is attractive for buyers on a budget seeking comfort and mileage, but it lags significantly in wet/snow performance and aquaplaning resistance. For mixed‑condition driving or colder climates the Continental is the recommended choice; for urban, low‑risk use with a tight budget the Linglong can be a sensible compromise.

Neither tyre in this comparison has been replaced by a newer model in our dataset. Explore full test pages and manufacturer information:

• Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — product page • Manufacturer: Continental


• Linglong Grip Master 4S — product page • Manufacturer: Linglong

Bottom line: choose the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 for top all‑season safety and balanced performance; choose the Linglong Grip Master 4S only if budget, comfort and mileage are your primary criteria and you accept trade‑offs in wet/snow safety.