Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

Overview: This comparison contrasts the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 (our rating: 87%) with the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 (our rating: 81%). Both are positioned as premium all‑season tyres; neither model has been replaced by a newer generation so there is no direct successor to link to. For full spec pages see the Continental tyre here: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Goodyear tyre here: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. Manufacturer pages: Continental and Goodyear.

Summary of test results: Across multiple independent tests (AutoBild, AUTOBILD, ACE, SPORTAUTO, Autozeitung and others) the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 consistently ranks in the top tier — frequent podium finishes (1–3) and a strong overall score. Test highlights repeatedly praise its snow performance, wet braking and handling, low rolling resistance and low noise levels. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 performs well and is often described as a very balanced all‑round tyre, with particular strengths in aquaplaning resistance in some tests, reliable snow traction, and in several reports good wet handling. However, its test positions are typically a few places lower (commonly 3–6), and several tests note slightly weaker wet/dry braking or modest reserves in extreme wet scenarios compared with the Continental.

Strengths — Continental AllSeasonContact 2:

• Wet & snow performance: Repeatedly highlighted for short wet braking and excellent snow traction/handling.


• Comfort & noise: Low exterior noise and comfortable ride in several tests.


• Efficiency: Low rolling resistance gave it an edge in fuel economy comparisons.


• Consistent top placements: Often finishes in the top 3 in comparative tests, reflecting all‑round excellence.

Weaknesses — Continental AllSeasonContact 2: Higher purchase price; some tests mention limited reserves in certain aquaplaning scenarios and a tendency toward understeer in sporty cornering.

Strengths — Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3:

• Balanced performance: Solid across dry, wet and winter tests — a true all‑rounder.


• Aquaplaning & stability: Noted for good longitudinal aquaplaning resistance and stable wet handling in several reports.


• Snow traction & longevity: Multiple reviews praise snow grip and, in some tests, strong tread life.

Weaknesses — Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3: Slightly longer braking distances in some wet/dry tests and higher pass‑by noise reported in a few reviews. Overall test positions typically trail the Continental, reflecting small but consistent deficits in braking and high‑speed wet handling.

Head‑to‑head verdict: While both tyres are very capable all‑season choices, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 emerges as the overall winner in most comparative tests due to superior wet braking, winter grip and lower rolling resistance — factors that translate to measurable safety and economy benefits. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 is an excellent alternative if you prioritise a balanced package with good aquaplaning resistance and solid snow performance, and it can represent better value depending on local pricing. In short: choose Continental for top‑tier wet/snow performance and efficiency; choose Goodyear for a dependable, well‑balanced all‑round tyre that performs consistently across conditions.

Want the details? Read the full pages for each tyre: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3.