Segment
2. Dunlop All Season 2 Premium
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Dunlop All Season 2
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Dunlop All Season 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Round-up of test results: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2
Across multiple independent tyre tests the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Dunlop All Season 2 show very different profiles. Our consolidated scores (Continental 88% vs Dunlop 66%) and the position in comparative tests make the picture clear: the Continental is the more accomplished all-season tyre overall, while the Dunlop targets value and long mileage.
No model replacements are listed for either tyre at this time.
How they performed in the tests
- Autoexpress: Continental placed 2nd of 6 (noted for snow braking and wet handling); Dunlop finished 5th with rolling resistance as a plus.
- Auto Bild (large comparo): Continental ranked 7th of 30 with repeated praise for wet and dry handling and snow traction; Dunlop sat mid-pack at 15th, praised for snow performance and cost-efficiency.
- AUTOBILD (37 tyres): Continental 3rd—recognized for low exterior noise, rolling resistance and snow/wet handling; Dunlop was 11th, its headline strengths being price/value and mileage.
Summary: Continental consistently finishes in the top tier; Dunlop is a mid-field performer that stands out mainly on cost, fuel efficiency and longevity.
Strengths and weaknesses
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 (88%)
- Strengths: Excellent wet and snow performance (short braking distances and good grip), strong dry handling, low exterior noise and competitive rolling resistance — makes it a true all-rounder.
- Weaknesses: Slightly lower mileage/reserve life in some tests and an average showing in aquaplaning resistance; price is higher than budget alternatives.
Dunlop All Season 2 (66%)
- Strengths: Outstanding value for money, best-in-test mileage and favorable fuel efficiency/rolling resistance figures. A cost-conscious choice for high-mileage drivers.
- Weaknesses: Weaker wet and dry handling compared with top all-season tyres, some testers flagged longer wet braking distances and only moderate snow side grip — trade-offs for the lower price.
Which tyre is better overall?
When you compare test positions, detailed behaviour and our percentage ratings, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the clear overall winner for drivers seeking balanced performance across wet, dry and snowy conditions. It ranks consistently in the top 3–7 places in major comparatives and offers superior dynamic control and safety margins.
The Dunlop All Season 2 is a strong contender if your priority is cost-effectiveness and mileage. It delivers impressive longevity and value, but you must accept compromises in wet grip and sporty handling.
Verdict
If you want the best all-round grip, handling and safety in mixed conditions — choose the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and learn more from the manufacturer at Continental.
If budget and running costs are the primary concerns (high mileage, low price), the Dunlop All Season 2 offers excellent value; see the maker’s range at Dunlop.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 130 |
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 99.0 | 99.8 | 98.6 | 99.7 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 98.6 | 92.7 | 93.6 | 117 |
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Recommended | 97.6 | 99.3 | 93.5 | 99.7 | 98.6 | 100.0 | 99.1 | 87.0 | 94.4 | 130 |
| Show test details | ||||||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 3+ | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 41.5 | 44.9 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 42.5 | 49.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 3+ | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 41.6 | 57.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
