In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Ceat (50%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A has a better rating of 76% compared to 46% of the Ceat SportDrive SUV. The first tyre test of Ceat SportDrive SUV was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 235/55 R19 test, where both the SportDrive SUV and the Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A were tested.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2024 | 235/55 R19 | View |
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Ceat SportDrive SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.