In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than GoodYear (79%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Weather Control A005 and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 90% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Weather Control A005
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | 2- | |||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Test winner | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 40,9 | 45 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41,6 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||