Segment
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will analyze the performance of two allround tyres: the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. Both tyres have been tested and reviewed by various sources, and we will summarize their strengths and weaknesses based on the available data.
Starting with the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO - this tyre offers excellent grip in wet and dry conditions, and boasts of good aquaplaning resistance and short dry braking distances. In the Tyre Reviews comparison, the A005 EVO's best feature was its rolling resistance. However, it significantly falls short in its snow performance, with the longest braking, lowest traction, and most difficult snow handling lap. It also has the highest internal noise among the tested tyres. Overall, this Bridgestone tyre scored well in dry and wet conditions, but proved to be weak in snow.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro performs exceptionally well in wet conditions. It has the shortest wet braking and fastest wet handling lap, as well as low internal noise. Nevertheless, it has some downsides, including low grip in snow and dry conditions and low aquaplaning resistance. Additionally, the Quatrac Pro has the highest rolling resistance in the test. Based on these results, the Vredestein tyre stands out for its wet performance but lacks in snow and dry conditions.
In the mutual tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro have been neck and neck. In the ARBÖ test, the Quatrac Pro ranked 5th out of 9, while the A005 EVO secured the 6th position. In the Autobild test, the A005 EVO came 5th out of 10, with the Quatrac Pro right behind in the 6th position. The Gute-Fahrt test, however, saw the A005 EVO securing the 3rd position in a pool of 7, while the Quatrac Pro only managed to rank 5th.
To sum up, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO shines in wet and dry conditions but has very limited snow performance. It has a better overall ranking than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro, which excels in wet conditions but lacks in snow and dry grip. Depending on your driving conditions and priorities, you may choose between the two Bridgestone and Vredestein tyres based on their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 46 | 19 | 9 | ||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended | 28 | 64 | 44 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Recommended | 46 | 59 | 43 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42 | 50 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Good + | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
