Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206,7 | 82,5 | 93,3 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | 202,3 | 96,2 | 97 | ||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Recommended | 204,0 | 95,7 | 98,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
