• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autoklub ČR Autoklub ČR
Summer
2023 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

The following is a comparison of two summer touring tyres: Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. These tyres have been subject to various tests to determine their performance under different conditions.


Bridgestone Turanza T005


Manufactured in Hungary, Poland, France, and Italy by Bridgestone, the Turanza T005 is a high-performing tyre with an 89% rating on our scale. The T005 has consistently showcased strong performance in testing. Most notably, it claimed the top position in the Autobild test, dominated by its dry and wet braking, and wet handling capabilities. Additionally, it placed third and fourth in the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests respectively, recognized for its impressive rolling resistance and wet cornering performance.


Bridgestone Turanza T005's noted strengths include a balanced drive on both dry and wet roads, high efficiency and a decent environmental footprint. However, the tyre's performance is slightly hindered by its reduced mileage.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


Developed by Kumho as a successor to the Ecsta HS51, the Ecsta HS52 has earned an 81% rating on our scale. Although it has not outperformed the Turanza T005 in any of the mentioned tests, it was placed third in Autobild test, excelling in areas such as dry braking and price-value offering. It also achieved the eighth position in the ADAC test.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52’s strengths lie in its balanced performance on both dry and wet roads, short dry and wet braking distances, comfort, and good price-to-performance ratio. On the downside, it was criticized for its delayed steering response and environmental impact, and lower efficiency and sustainability when compared with the Bridgestone Turanza T005.


Conclusion


After analyzing all the test results, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 appears to be the stronger performer overall. Although the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has commendable qualities and a good price-to-performance ratio, it lags behind in efficiency, environmental impact, and steering response. It's imperative to choose a tyre model that best suits your driving style and conditions.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T005
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Best: Uniroyal RainSport 5 (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
56%
Best in category: Uniroyal RainSport 5 (92.2%)
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
90%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (99.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Economy
Bridgestone Turanza T005
75%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
61%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison