• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

# Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
/90%
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
/63%

Add to comparison

Bridgestone
Ceat
DimensionsR16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

The following comparison distils independent test results and lab data for the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive. Both are marketed as all‑season tyres, but test outcomes and performance profiles differ sharply. Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation at the time of testing.


At a glance: the Bridgestone scored 89% in our rating and finished 3rd of 16 in Autobild tests, while the Ceat managed only 45% and placed 15th. These headline numbers reflect consistent gaps across wet, dry and winter-relevant checks.


Summary of test data


Across Autobild test editions (2023, 2025 and combined comparisons) the Turanza All Season 6 is repeatedly praised for short wet and dry braking distances, agile handling and strong aquaplaning reserves — traits that underpin its top‑three finish. The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive scores positively for long mileage, low rolling noise and an attractive price, but shows clear weaknesses: limited winter traction, weak lateral control on snow and longer wet braking distances, which explain its low placement.


Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 — strengths & weaknesses



  • Strengths: Excellent dry handling and braking; strong wet performance (short wet braking and good aquaplaning resistance); balanced, secure on mixed conditions. These traits produce consistent podium results in independent tests.

  • Weaknesses: Higher price point is repeatedly noted by testers as a trade‑off for performance.

  • Verdict: The Turanza is an all‑season that performs like a premium summer-capable tyre with added wet safety. It is best for drivers prioritising safety and dynamic handling year‑round.

  • Manufacturer: Bridgestone


Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — strengths & weaknesses



  • Strengths: Good kilometrage (wear), quiet rolling, and a competitive price — attractive for budget‑conscious buyers focused on mileage and comfort.

  • Weaknesses: Noticeable compromises in winter performance (poor snow lateral grip) and extended wet braking distances; these factors drive down safety margins in adverse conditions and produce low test rankings.

  • Verdict: The 4 SeasonDrive is a value option for mild climates and drivers who prioritise cost and tread life over top wet/winter safety.

  • Manufacturer: Ceat


Head‑to‑head conclusion


When comparing mutual test positions and overall scores, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is clearly superior. It delivers stronger wet and dry control, better aquaplaning resistance and far better braking performance — key factors for a safe all‑season tyre. The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive only stands out on price, noise and mileage; however, its compromised wet and winter behaviour make it a less suitable choice for areas with frequent rain or snowfall.


Recommendation: choose the Turanza for best overall safety and handling; choose the Ceat only if budget and tread life are your highest priorities and you accept reduced wet/winter performance.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

3

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test38.043.9
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 638.145.0
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive38.647.4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 638.545
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive40.850.1
Show test details
Autobild
Name
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Rating: Exemplary
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
Rating: Conditionally recommended
Show test details