Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended3. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.4 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Very good | 8.9 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 7.2 | |||
| Michelin E.Primacy Rating: Very good | 7.3 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
