Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended3. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner
Worst rating in test
3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 60.1 | 26 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
