Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Handling on gravel
Gravel traction
Sand traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
