Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 83% compared to 72% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Powerproof 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
| Nokian Powerproof 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport EVO | 34.5 | 28.2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Rating: Highly recommended | 138 | 66 | 55 | 17 | 13 | 4 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||