Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Linglong (45%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 83% compared to 76% of the Linglong Sport Master. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Sport Master were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport EVO | 34.5 | 28.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Rating: Highly recommended | 138 | 66 | 55 | 17 | 13 | 4 | |
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Recommended | 129 | 68 | 44 | 17 | 11 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||