In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 87% compared to 78% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2026 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.