Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 87% compared to 83% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
