Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing two summer tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, we need to pay close attention to their performances across multiple tyre tests.
In the comparison conducted by AutoBild, out of 50 tyres tested, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 claimed the 3rd position while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti managed the 8th place. Notably, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti excelled in several features including Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking, Wet handling, and Wet side guide.
However, in the ADAC tests, out of 16 tyres tested, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti secured a position above Bridgestone Potenza S001. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti bagged the 7th position showing strengths in mileage and Exterior noise, while the Bridgestone Potenza S001 fell a few spots behind at 9th but also stood out in the feature of Aquaplaning - cross.
Delving into the details of the individual tyres, Bridgestone Potenza S001 produced by Bridgestone is a summer tyre that offers a good balance of wet and dry performance. The tyre doesn't have any previous models or newer models to compare to, but it has been recognized for its exceptional feature in resisting Aquaplaning - which is crucial during heavy summer rains.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, manufactured in the Netherlands by Vredestein, also doesn't have any previous models or newer models for direct comparison. However, this tyre has exhibited strength in an array of wet condition features such as Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking, Wet handling, and Wet side guide. In addition, it showed impressive mileage and tolerable Exterior noise according to ADAC tests.
In summary, while the Bridgestone Potenza S001 appears to lead in the AutoBild tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti outperforms in the ADAC tests and exhibits a broader array of strong features. Thus, the choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific preferences and driving conditions of the user.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
