Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Firestone (68%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza S001 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Potenza S001 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Bridgestone Potenza S001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||