Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||