18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%	Pirelli CARRIER WINTER /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%	Falken EuroWinter VAN01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R15 - R17	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 36

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 32

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

Number of tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 1x

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 1x

Best position in test

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

Worst position in test

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

Average position in tests

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 2019

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

Wet braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

Wet circle cornering

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 72%

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet handling

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 57%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 57%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 67%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

81%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 71%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

75%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Snow braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 78%

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 56%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 76%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 74%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 64%

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 40%

Snow traction

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 83%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 83%

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 50%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

81%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

63%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 91%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 56%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

Interior noise

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

4. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

87%

Pirelli
CARRIER WINTER

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER C

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended	3,3	2,4	2,8	2,7	3,4	2,5	1,9
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,3	3,2	4,0	2,3	2,6	2,0	1,8
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands