Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho PorTran CW51 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||