Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak Lm005 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak Lm005 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak Lm005 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak Lm005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak Lm005
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 94%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow traction
2. Nokian WR D4 89%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
