Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Wanli S1083 Snowgrip Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Wanli S1083 Snowgrip
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Wanli). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Wanli (0%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo and Wanli S1083 Snowgrip, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Wanli S1083 Snowgrip first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the S1083 Snowgrip were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Wanli S1083 Snowgrip
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | 97 | 123 | 135 | |||
| Wanli S1083 Snowgrip Rating: - | 316 | 59 | 134 | 123 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
