Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2015 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the W.drive V905 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,6 | 6,7 | 8,5 | 8,0 | 7,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
