Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory3. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended3. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,0 | 7,9 | 8,7 | 8,4 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,7 | 7,2 | 7,8 | 8,2 | 7,9 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,6 | 6,7 | 8,5 | 8,0 | 7,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
