Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Michelin Alpin 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Bridgestone (87%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the Alpin 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has C wet grip rating, whereas 88% of Michelin Alpin 5 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 99,9 | 100 | 94,2 | 84,9 | 99,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
