Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R19 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,7 | 7,2 | 7,8 | 8,2 | 7,9 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,6 | 6,7 | 8,5 | 8,0 | 7,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
