Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium4. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended3. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended4. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 98,4 | 99,4 | 100 | 98,4 | 98,8 | ||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 99,6 | 99 | 94,8 | 93 | 99,1 | ||
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S | 97,8 | 99,6 | 95 | 90 | 100 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,2 | 9,4 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: - | 9,1 | 8,7 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
