Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium4. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Michelin Alpin 5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 98,4 | 99,4 | 100 | 98,4 | 98,8 | ||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 99,6 | 99 | 94,8 | 93 | 99,1 | ||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 99,9 | 100 | 94,2 | 84,9 | 99,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,2 | 9,4 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: - | 9,1 | 8,7 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
