Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium3. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium4. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium5. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.883. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good4. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Satisfactory5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 98,4 | 99,4 | 100 | 98,4 | 98,8 | ||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 99,9 | 100 | 94,2 | 84,9 | 99,1 | ||
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S | 97,8 | 99,6 | 95 | 90 | 100 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,2 | 9,4 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,0 | 7,9 | 8,7 | 8,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
