Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory3. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended3. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 98,4 | 99,4 | 100 | 98,4 | 98,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,2 | 9,4 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,7 | 7,2 | 7,8 | 8,2 | 7,9 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,6 | 6,7 | 8,5 | 8,0 | 7,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
