Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Bridgestone (87%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the Winter Sport 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has C wet grip rating, whereas 59% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 98,7 | 98,7 | 98,1 | 100 | 99 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: - | 9,0 | 9,2 | 9,0 | 9,2 | 8,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||