Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 vs. Nokian WeatherProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 has E wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian WeatherProof has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25
| Nokian WeatherProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
